It's inaccurate to equate the proposal to "taking away from the authors and giving to those that have large upvotes".
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
It's inaccurate to equate the proposal to "taking away from the authors and giving to those that have large upvotes".
Its rather a figure of speech or its a lapsus from my part in explaining my position. You arent "taking away", but you are creating a system that is even more focused towards accumulation of wealth in the hands of the wealthy. I dont think that should be the case.
The problem here is the stake based reward system. I have high hopes for SMTs and their 1 account/ 1 vote system Ned intends to move towards.
It has its own problems, but maybe then we wont need to rely on whale support. If SMTs werent a thing i probably wouldnt be giving my critical opinion on a large account like yours. haha. :D
No one can tell if you're a dog or cat on the internet, even the blockchain..
edit: and extrapolate a few years down when most people aren't gonna give out their votes.
Well it was nice talking to you, regardless if i agree or not. Off to tell Grumpycat he is wrong about something. See how it goes. hahaha.
See ya round. ;)
Lol btw to clarify, I'm liking that 1 account / 1 vote system as well. It's value, security, scalability etc will depend on use case.
Kev, i read this post linked below. I think you might find it interesting. Its not really connected to our convo, but since you are a manual curator im pretty sure you will find this very "frustrating" if you arent already aware of the practice.
See ya.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@firedream/another-way-of-milking-the-system