bros @ehiboss, though i am still new here, just a week, i strongly stand with you, i think this hardforked thing happened a few days ago ba ? i guess @ned should consider disabling Minnows to vote for their self cos that's just straight up selfishnes, maybe when someone's full vote power reaches lets say $10 or any cetain stage steemit deems the user and the account matured, then such user can vote for him/her self.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
but the fact of being able to vote your comment should be totally abolished or controlled, controlled as in voting your comment will use like 5% or less voting power from your overall voting power. hope you understand what i mean ?
I agree with most of what you just said.
Like i always say, you own steemit. You bother too much about people and you should have your facts right. Why not simply wait. Hardforks takes some time to stablilize. Last hardfork it took one month for the reward pool to go back to full after it was emptied and it is obvious, you don't know how voting works. You think people sit and go upvote your posts manually. Many votes are triggered by parameters and where set to something before hardfork. Now with hardfork, many old parameter have adjusted and some people have not yet updated and some people are trying just the right parameters and this will go on for some weeks till everything is stabilized. And who told you upvote is only for rewards? Some people upvote you for visibility. And i always tell you, stop looking at people or looking at their rep and stuff. The people you call minnows may be whales. Who knows if you are whale with you main whale account somewhere. and many accounts among voters can be bot accounts and just there to trigger other votes. And the first people up had great points too. And the other people below, who will fix them
Maybe I bother about those I care about, maybe I dont know much about voting system, but read through my post and you will get my angle. It is about morality. How will someone comment on a post, upvote his comment, implore you to vote for him and wont vote you, what is that called? Show me where I went wrong and perhaps I will rephrase it. Like I said, the post had a deeper meaning and you of all people who taught me to read the deeper meaning of a post missed it.
Nothing deep here except misinfo! So relax. Do your studies and you will understand. Not every comment on steemit is a human. And what you said, bots do it. It is like you talking to cheetah. There are always ways to handle things to handle things a man without drawing so much attention. I grasp you points, i am just being very indirect with you. The first two comments had points but you skipped them, if i had seen you respond to their comments, i won't bother commenting. "Saying you would brought 50 people on steemit etc what's that and you now hesitate. People have brought thousands from their google ranking and you have brought thousands without knowing. You own steemit and even if you brought one million people, it is for the good of you steem and if you don't bring, other people will bring it and no issues there. There are many newbies and not everyone is a fast learner. Some are experimenting with upvotes and you can't tell for sure their intentions and what if they upvote their comments. A comment below innocently explained why he upvotes his comment. it just like saying why do people get 25 percent for simply upvoting; cos curation in itself is a talent and because it is a talent, many people leave their curation in other people's hand and are simply innocent. if you feel i missed your point all good. Ofcourse, i can be wrong. If you are certain about what these people are doing, why not contact them in the background and educate them or if you are so certain you have the facts right, why not mention names in your post. And if they do wrong, why not simply do right and move on. Talking of deeper meaning, that is deeper meaning, when you are truly hurt by the actions of people and you try sift good from their bad!
You guys should learn before talking and have your facts right. You are misinformed!
If going by your statement of parameters, it means people are intentionally doing it. But like I said this is not about voting power but using it judiciously. It is not about me, something prompted me to talk. When last did I mention such. Life is beautiful when we help others.....maybe you misunderstood me.