"Showing that crypto calls make money isn't that big of a deal. What we need to do is look at how the rest of the market did during the same period. Is he outpacing the overall bull trend or is he just calling shots in bull market and having success?"
This is exactly what I am calling for. Evidence offered before attacking these authors. If this analyst is a charlatan, it should be easy to show, and then flagging can commence. All I see is mudslinging and "too many rewards" being thrown around, with no definition of what is too much.
Haejin isn't even buying votes, presumably, but merely being voted a lot. Flagging him with the cry of "this person is making too much", and offering no evidence, is precisely a communist attitude.
There is no such thing as too much, only too much relative to merit, and no argument has been offered on this point.