You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @Grumpycat answers @Wackou, (Grumpycat picture inside)

in #steem7 years ago

I would suggest to whitelist the good content creators than blacklisting the spammers. I don't know, but I don't think there are 3500 quality content creators who want to use bid bot service, but I know there would be more than 10,000 spammers, and they can always make a new account.

It would take less time to manually select the good content creators than to judge whether a person is a spammer or not.

Recently @minnowbooster applied this process, though not to a complete extent.

But of course, bid bot business will hurt badly if this process is applied, just saying!

Sort:  

Smartsteem.com has been doing this for months now and over 1400 users have been whitelisted so far. https://smartsteem.com/users/whitelist

Appreciate it, do you review the posts of the users who bid big, like 40-50 sbd/steem or more, or is there a cap for maximum bid?

The whitelist is currently only for the direct votes, but not for the bid-bot. Manual reviewing the bids takes a lot of time - but I personally unvoted over 40 posts from one abuse ring.

That's great!

@therealwolf

Does a higher smart score give you a higher curation payout?

very good news and link.thank you.