I agree with you, but some people will disagree. One day, when people are angry at Steemit, Inc, they will just throw random accusations and taking rewards will be one of them.
So why anger people needlessly? Even if they are wrong, she’s the Managing Director and should try making everyone happy. She doesn’t need the 5$ from this post so why not avoid making some guys angry?
Posted using Partiko iOS
@marki99 https://steemit.com/steem/@andrarchy/the-importance-of-dogfooding
Thanks - was going to post this same link, but I see you already did 🙂
Saw this post, they can dogfood without accepting rewards. Remember @ned’s selfupvote? Look up the amount of posts written about that.
Posted using Partiko iOS
without up /down votes that would be considered fake doggy food to me
When you try to make everyone happy, you end up making no one happy. People will people and some will complain. There is no reason for @elipowell to not accept rewards on posts she takes the time to write. People were complaining she wasn't posting, now she is they will find something else. Complaining will never end.
This is one of the last reasons one would have to be angry at (more like disappointed in) Steemit, Inc.
Posted using Partiko Android