Then @thecryptodrive could have paid you for it. This feels like a misuse of the SPS so that he can be an early proposal creator.
I love also how he says you guys worked as a team when you did 99% of the work.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dude did you not even read how much time I put into this, you are pushing the developer bias I’m talking about. It’s a totally fair showcase of how the SPS can be used, I have no problem having paid for it, however I wanted to test the SPS and this was the first thing that came to mind, I left some valuable user feedback in slack for the steempeak team to improve their ui which is useful as well, I’m trying to be a team player all round as well as push the investment value of Steem, but now all the public will see on this post is grumps like you complaining.
I mean on the SPS there is some $200 lawsuit thing for two years, another wanting $20 a day for a year which becomes $7300 overall but you guys choose to target a proposal of 200 bucks? For real?
Again, guess you don't realize how much time EVERYONE puts in. They don't all complain like you do. Guess BuildTeam isn't paying too well.
Yes @thecryptodrive, both your proposals are shit. Thanks for helping others realize you can dislike multiple things at once since apparently that thought hadn't crossed your mind.
The refund proposal is stopping ALL other proposals right now, thankfully.
What both?
The only people with issues are you and wolf, it seems your nature to detract from progress.
Both the proposal you created and the one you tried to use to make some stupid point.
Just clearing up you didn’t think I submitted that one also. :)