Maybe if 95% of the inflation went to more than 100 accounts more people would want to play?
what exactly you mean by that?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Maybe if 95% of the inflation went to more than 100 accounts more people would want to play?
what exactly you mean by that?
Do you have numbers that show anything different?
How can 'multiple millions' be expected to buy into a game where the rewards only go to the top 100 accounts?
The top ten voters control ~25% of the daily rewards. Source
~19% goes to proof of wallet and pay to play. Source
9% goes to mrdelegation beneficiaries.
There is ~50% and we have accounted for less than 20 accounts.
thats not 50% as 25% daily rewards and the 19% contain duplicate accounts.
As for 9% to misterdelegation, well if you look how far these rewards are spread, is more focused niche curation
I get there are duplicate accounts, care to put out definitive numbers about how far down the sp ladder rewards make it so i can stop ballparking numbers?
Regardless of where it goes, it is still taken from the rewards available to attract users not favored by the ninjaminers.
Until the ninjamine takes its thumb off the scales nobody gets the wisdom of the crowd as they should.
Under linear rewards we get proof of wallet, we get that in our daily lives, who wants to come here for more of the same?
Presuming a successful platform is the goal, and not just an exit scam for the earliest adopters, we should expect those with the keys to the code to act like it.
That is not the impression the newbs have been getting, clearly, as evidenced by their absence.