I have always found it interesting that apart from @gtg, @freedom and @blocktrades votes are 'mutually exclusive'.
I wonder if that tells us anything....
What would the order look like when @blocktrades is excluded from the voting too?
And then to even it out a bit more, how would it look if say all 10 top megavoters were excluded? This would of course simulate some sort of voting weight cap that might be an interesting option to explore (although probably easily exploitable).
Founder of the A Dollar A Day charitable giving project.
Yes, I'm sure there's a logic to that and it is deliberate, though I can't say more than that for sure.
I didn't remove blocktrades since they actually run an active witness and it seemed a bit too warping to add that complication in there. I think Andy might do well to make his reports adjustable in future, so we can see what happens when certain votes go elsewhere!