I would say all the above have some part in this...
But there a few other possibilities to add:
- too much power in very few hands. This make steem waaaay more centralized than any other blockchain project
- those holding that power spend too much time shilling the system than actually improving it (with a few exceptions of course)
- steem was never "marketed" (is that a word?) The right way since the begining. It was always about "how much money you can make" and not about "how useful can this be"
- the ascendency of (even if for a short time) of characters that clearly had the objective of sucking the reward pool dry (can I already say it's name? Or we are still receiving flags for that) and with the support of some big stake holders
- 2017 price spike was way more damaging to Steem image than anything else. At the time, using steemit = free money
- a CEO that was pretty incompetent, more worried about making his old partner look bad than improving what needed to be improved
- a endless circle-jerking among big stake holders
- some witnesses that dont seem to understand what their actual role is supposed to be
- probably a lot of other stuff I can't remember right now.
- oh yeah, I remembered another one: compared to other platform, steem is way worse to professional content creator (why the fuck would I choose to have only 7 days to receive from my work if I can be paid for life as long as my content is up?)
Ouch, the last point hit the nail on the head and it hurts alot 😨
Posted using Partiko Android