You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Negative Voting and Steem

in #steem8 years ago

There are 400 votes in... is it worth 2.6K$ NO...It does need to be discussed. Also I have to question why ,said person, (please i'm only suggesting, asking a question) knowing this post would trend regardless of his SP? why not give the post enough to trend and let it bee? I can't see the slider of SP so don't know if it is active on steemit yet...
One suggestion to the curation of a "bad" whale after an downvote. Why not after an "also large" fish/fishes down vote say in effect of 50% of post value(pre flagging). Overturn the curation reward proportionally to the lesser voters(minnow) that simply wanted voiced there opinion on said post... or all together, only pay out to users/ account below some SP level? This should ensure we do not see post's with excessive SBD or the biggest fish simply does not get any curation reward.(The slider of SP would be handy). We could also say that this "function" is only in effect on posts above a certain value of Steem( not per say SBD).... What do you think?