Your comment is especially funny. Steem. It has been based for the last two years on an exclusion system that is based on power, not on wanting to participate.
Good joke. That you especially say what you say.
Your comment is especially funny. Steem. It has been based for the last two years on an exclusion system that is based on power, not on wanting to participate.
Good joke. That you especially say what you say.
Are you referring to rewards distribution or witness voting or both?
DPoS is based on token distribution. Those who have the tokens make the rules and influence how the rewards distribution happens. What do you suggest that is better than DPoS that isn't easily sybil attackable?