Also, you present a false dilemma: the notion that votes must be weighted linearly (or quadratically, however that works) , or not at all (1-man-1-vote.). And just as a side note, ive never heard anyone actually say that it ought to be one man one vote.
There are actually many models that could provide some normalization, while still giving regular voters some effect on ultimate outcome.
For example, the quadratic mean that i talked about above, or RMS, which i kind of feel like your post is implying we use now, even though im pretty sure we don't. I actually wrote a post about how something like that would help the rewards proccess, but ultimately decided why bother.
I replied to your other comment on this page. And that is enough already.
thanks, but i really don't need you to tell me when i can and can't post.
I meant that is enough for me replying to you already. Of course I can't control what you do. Thanks.