This reply confused me, its like you are stating you want to disagree but then you sort of go ahead and agree? No snark, you lost me here.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This reply confused me, its like you are stating you want to disagree but then you sort of go ahead and agree? No snark, you lost me here.
Haha! Okay I see that. What I'm saying is yes, for emergencies but it's theoretically always available, even now, but it is unthinkable to many witnesses. So no, not the 100th thing you try, the 5th thing.
The difference of attitude I'm talking about is perhaps more important. Repeat after me: We can go back. No one believes that.