I would support a well-presented proposal, but even if all of us supported it, this still doesn't guarantee the funding would remain activated for the entire time. There are plenty of non-voting stakeholders who could start voting and cut off or redirect the funding, and it is also possible over six months that new stakeholders become active or some existing stakeholders become inactive.
So any plan would need to address the contingency of partial funding.
Yes that is the nature (limitation) of the SPS. Have to work with what we have, and plan accordingly.
Right. It isn't an issue that is unique to this proposal. We've encouraged everyone making proposals to think about and state clearly what they will do in the event of partial funding.
Yes I have picked up on that. Definitely an issue to address in a proposal.