I downvoted the post not because I disagree with the post or think it is not a quality post but because I do not think that the interests of Steem are served by every platform or devteam update or request for community feedback pulling thousands of dollars from the reward pools that go to ordinary users. The reward consensus algorithm also disproportionately rewards these posts since they are the only thing that 100% of Steem users have in common (aside from being human, etc.).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I fully agree. One of the biggest pitfalls of Steem could be that it is a self-marginalizing technocracy. A platform like this requires diversity and culture, and should reward out of box thinking, not group think.