Dan made an unambiguous statement in his resignation thread about specifically why he chose to leave. It doesn't mention the license.
It's possible you have the cause and effect inverted.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Dan made an unambiguous statement in his resignation thread about specifically why he chose to leave. It doesn't mention the license.
It's possible you have the cause and effect inverted.
Agreed. I've been reading through Dan's comments, and he didn't say all that much, so this post was speaking volumes at the time it was published. As I said in reply to @kafkanarchy84: It's just a theory.
@full-steem-ahead: here's the refutation you mentioned wanting to see.
Your link for refutation is bad. Is it appears to be a link to a comment in this article, is that right Luke?
Yes, I was linking to your comment about not seeing a refutation from @sneak while replying to his refutation. Make sense?
If my current confusion is cleared up by you informing me that @jianjolly == sneak then kewlness, otherwise I'm still confused.
Maybe this will help. If you see something different, that would be odd.