but they won't get down to 0%; each vote past the "limit" takes a percentage of the remaining VP, not a set amount
so let's say X = the limited voting power, and Y = remaining vote power
relatively inactive users spend X
vs active users who spend
X + (X-%Y1) + (X-%Y2) + etc etc
I do get the point about rationing votepower, but since I tend to upvote as a "like" rather than as a curating strategy the valid argument doesn't resonate with me. Not saying it's wrong.
It's a figure of speech, let's say to down to nearly 0 to satisfy the pedants in us :)
;> I understand that LOL