You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Locking stake for 100% passive income, improving content, helping apps

in #steem • 6 years ago (edited)

The current reward pool could be devided 50/50 into two PoS/PoB pools.
Let's say Bob is the only one who chooses PoS. He would alone get the 50% of the current reward pool then. Of course it will not really happen, Alice and others would join. At some point ROI in PoS pool would't satisfy Bob any more and he might decide to migrate back to PoB pool. So, some dinamic equilibrium will be found.

6 years ago in #steem by
$0.00
    Reply 5
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago  

    The idea is to not incentivize behavior in either way for maximizing profits, but let people choose freely if they care more about ROI or PoB

    [-]
     6 years ago (edited) 

    I didn't plan to intentivise anything, just proposing some solution for this dilemma :

    Unfortunately, where it gets stuck is that the math never works out in a way that is feasible. It either doesn't offer sufficient rewards for it to be "worth it" for investors to be passive, or it takes way too much of the rewards away from the active users in order to pay for the program.

    $0.00
      Reply
      [-]
       6 years ago  

      If everyone loves all their stake to passive, we have a much bigger problem. The whole concept of rewarding good content would be wishful thinking then. I don't believe it is.

      $0.00
        Reply
        [-]
         6 years ago (edited) 

        If everyone loves all their stake to passive- but you don't - then, under my proposal, you alone will distribute 50% of the current reward pool.

        $0.00
          Reply
          [-]
           6 years ago  

          Which is a bad thing, because maximizers will switch their stake back and forth depending on profitability, and we wouldn't solve a single current issue.