And what Spam is sthere? What is he selling? What did he ever try get people to send him money for?
Isnt that what spammers do?
Hey, if one doesnt feel EW or TA is valid, that is their choice and open to a valid discussion.
The simple fact is most, including @hendrix22, down voting this guy without having any clue about the situation.
Then to top it off, @hendrix22 blames @haejin for fucking up his voting power for a week? Who told him to jump on the bandwagon and down vote? Was it @haejin?
As I said, if one goes back through his calls over the few months, he has been right a lot more than he is wrong.
I bet half the people on here who own Bitshares (and are profiting nicely) are in it because of @haejin's analysis of it.
Great points, @taskmaster4450.
I dislike @haejin content because it's paper thin. If most of his posts were in-depth, I wouldn't have a problem.
But when someone is constantly posting thin content to game the system, then I do have a problem.
Thanks for the reply @abijahchristros.
Having an issue with his content is valid...as is an issue with his entire analysis approach. EW is a debateable subject as is TA in general. There are minds a lot smarter than me debating both sides of the issue.
That said, I do have to say that @haejin's analysis has not changed from what I can see. EW is a pattern recognition technique which tends to be evolutionary over time....each of his posts (within a token) follow the last post.
He has been doing the same thing since he was getting $1.25 a post...over the last month he became popular (with this bull run, people are making money with his calls) and now he gets blasted.
Perhaps he is gaming the system and he had a plan all along. Perhaps he is ranchorlaxo...I have no idea.
That is all my point is.
if you care about the platform do something about this abuse...grumpy cat is gaming the reward pool
https://steemit.com/@checkthisout/transfers
😶
@tt-dogg, I saw paper-thin content filled with lots of hype words, unclear phrasing, missing words, etc. It looked like spam so I flagged it.
That's not abuse of power.
If I read his content, disagreed with the message, and then flagged it... that would be abuse of power.
😐
I removed my flags when I saw Haejin wasn't a scam.
Don't understand why you're threatening me?
Remember last time the crew attacked us?
This post did not age well at all.
Turned out, it's not hard to be right in the BTC bull market. It happened in 2013. It happened in 2017. lol
You're obviously not understanding my words. I'll keep it simple and short. In my opinion 1-4 posts per day is acceptable 10-20 is not.
I don't need a chart wizard to tell me that bitshares @ $0.05 is a good buy lol
He posts 5-10 times a day. Usually 1-2 of those have a video explaining his analysis. The short ones are usually follow up posts since his thousands of followers are constantly asking him for updates. They don't require as much content.
Make some more posts too. There are no rule about number of posts, so if you want one just make a post about it :-p
His posts are in response to requests to his followers. If he replied to every one there would be hundreds of posts a day. Of course those who can not compete in an open market will call for regulation and censorship. Kind of goes against the whole concept of BTC and Crypto currencies
The reason I joined steem was because of @haejin's calls. I have given him many up votes and watch his videos daily because of how invaluable his advice has been.
So instead of being bitter, be better.
So why is this not a rule? Built in? Blaming haejin when he’s done nothing wrong? You fucking retard
I see you went on a flag frenzy on my posts. He has done something wrong hence this post! I will refrain from name calling back :)
You deserve all you get