Are you in favour of this proposal or rather in favor of a dynamic power-down period? Because this proposal will only allow people to choose between 4 and 13 weeks. That's still far too rigid for the diverse culture we have here.
p.s.: I invested over $40K my personal money on Steem, powering up, and never power down till now, and the money becomes less than $3K. But I DID NOT POWER DOWN BECAUSE of the 13 weeks power-down period. People who need power down will do anyway regardless of the power down period limitation, and this SHOULDN'T be our core to maintain.
Just making sure I understood this correctly:
You didn't power down, because of the 13 weeks period? Afterwards, you're writing that "people who need to power--down will do that, regardless of the period limitation". Isn't this exactly the opposite of your reasoning?
I agree with the 4 weeks power down period (I'm sorry but I'm not aware of the dynamic power down period you mentioned). Thanks for your comment. I fixed some confusing words.
He should have used a double negative. What he meant is: I did not not powerdown because of the 13 weeks period.
As in, he kept his stake for Steem reasons, not friction reasons.