1st. It isn't that clear what it is all about.
2nd. It seems to me someone level headed, but also with some experience in other blockchain foundations and how they work would be ideal. So that they would have some ideas on how to model it.
3rd The current level of cooperation on Steem is going to put this role in someone's line of fire. Which I would be fine with IF I knew what I was getting into. No reason to subject myself to that with out knowing what it is about.
the other approach may be to leave your name there... see how things develop and if you're not comfortable with the outcome .. then step down. You'd be a good voice to have there @whatsup
I think it is going to create much strife this way...
A better way to do this to promote decentralization in my opinion. The terms and amount of the fund should be published and those who wish to manage it should present their team proposals for managing it. Ned could then pick the model he likes the best or spread some funds to 2 foundations and see which one can also obtain external funding. There is no reason to pretend these are public funds, when in fact at this point they would be coming from a private company. Also hopefully this group would be able to attract other sources of funding as well.
This just reinforces the current status quo. (my opinion)
1st. It isn't that clear what it is all about.
2nd. It seems to me someone level headed, but also with some experience in other blockchain foundations and how they work would be ideal. So that they would have some ideas on how to model it.
3rd The current level of cooperation on Steem is going to put this role in someone's line of fire. Which I would be fine with IF I knew what I was getting into. No reason to subject myself to that with out knowing what it is about.
the other approach may be to leave your name there... see how things develop and if you're not comfortable with the outcome .. then step down. You'd be a good voice to have there @whatsup
@shadowspub
The current Rambling Radio Schedule can be found here
It's All About Community!
I think it is going to create much strife this way...
A better way to do this to promote decentralization in my opinion. The terms and amount of the fund should be published and those who wish to manage it should present their team proposals for managing it. Ned could then pick the model he likes the best or spread some funds to 2 foundations and see which one can also obtain external funding. There is no reason to pretend these are public funds, when in fact at this point they would be coming from a private company. Also hopefully this group would be able to attract other sources of funding as well.
This just reinforces the current status quo. (my opinion)