There was a fair amount of opposition to this proposal the last time it was suggested..
One of the main concerns is that it will likely cause any stakeholder that is ‘negated’ to either power down their stake and cash out, or power down and power up a new account that is not negated. We either lose investors, or turn it into a “wack-a-mole” problem.
I do agree with the proposal to negate voters. What would be sweet would be a way to vote for certain proposal even before they are implemented with our stake. I guess this would be somewhat complex.
I didn't meant to hijack your post Bernie.
I don't know what was the puzzle but congrats to the one who won and that was a very generous prize if I understood that right.
here here! @teamsteem, another voice of reason :)