You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The definition of vote collusion @cryptopassion et Al.

in #steem7 years ago (edited)

Are you sure it's the quality that makes a Steemit article and author so successful?

Quality is subjective to the people with Steem Power and is usually based on either for the value it bring or for the people it attract to the platform.

Exposing large scale vote abuse and gathering support from other large stake holder would be, I suppose, of interest to stake holders.

Sort:  

Bullshit @transisto ! You always refuse to face reality, it's sad and now you don't even accept what you do and say anymore.

If this article is at $180 today it is because of " your " power, you are the one who propels it with your power only to enter the trend so that as many people as possible are aware of your childish denunciations.

Take a look at the figures 524 views and 141 votes, so 138 sheep and 383 that keep silent because they are afraid of losing your support or fear of getting angry. It is good to see these figures, which are very revealing of the dictatorship that is currently in place.

Come on, I see we'll never agree. You are for a Steemit Police and I am for freedom and to improve the system. You don't want to think about the underlying problem and would rather waste your time doing graphs to say, did this and did it as if we were in kindergarten.

I understood that we would never agree, so I'm going to talk to people who are looking for a real solution and not to people who denounce people in public, it's clearly against my philosophy and I'm so shocked.

Good luck with the rest.

Bullshit? How do you know other whales don't think similarly?

Have you seen me post 10 times a day? or once a week? Where do you think the rest of my SP goes? I give it away to where it can makes a difference.

So we agree, it is only the whales' opinion that counts on Steemit. When I speak here you have to understand that there is nothing personal, I know that you spend most of your time doing good and I find that very well I encourage you to continue and when you raise minnows I salute your actions.

What I want you to understand when I say "bullshit" is that the way Steemit is presented is not honest. There is a need to define rules and laws that should be accepted by all those who launch on this platform.

When we're honest about the presentation of Steemit, I'll totally agree and I'll even support you in your downvotes, but for the moment the rules are not clear and I think it's a bad thing to leave doubt.

Let's say the truth to come into play, Steemit's motto should not even contain the word reward. Come for the community is more than enough.

@transisto I only said the evil I thought of you but know that I support you when you make the minnows go up and that I am ready to change my mind about your downvotes when the rules are clear.

I think we can close the debate and now focus on finding a real solution, let us not waste our time and energy.

for the moment the rules are not clear and I think it's a bad thing to leave doubt.

Let's say the truth to come into play, Steemit's motto should not even contain the word reward. Come for the community is more than enough.

I agree with that, Steem was promoted by steemit as a place to get paid to post and not necessarily for contributing content that grow the ecosystem.

Not only whales opinion matter, The fact that I read and respond to your message confirms that. (didn't check, maybe you're also whale)

Yes, I am whale in the real life i might have to lose a little weight, by the way :-D .

But on Steemit I am not a whale and then, even if I had been, I would never have said it, the whales have a hard life on Steemit!