I agree completely. I don't get why editing has to be limited. If they're worried about people probably putting out offending statement and down the line changing it to make it seem like there's no reason why he/she's being avoided, isn't this blockchain open for everyone to see? One could simply just look at the person's activity and see whatever change was made -.- And really, you're spot on with the mistakes being discovered after a long time. Is it really too bad to be able to correct those mistakes and have your article improve? Wouldn't that be a good thing as it means better content for steemit to flaunt? And the external link ._. Don't even get me started :|
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thanks very much for your affirmation. It's great to be "preaching to the choir."
All we need now is a choir member who knows how to fix this... ;)
Or even a choir member who knows someone who can fix this :D Here's to more people joining the club. May our collective singing be loud enough to cause for a solution to happen.
:) :) :)