In that case current actions taken by him prove they were right and the measures should maybe even have been more decisive.
No they did not prove this, because its another context, you can not hit somebody and when he hit you back say that he hits back proves that he planned to hit me before i hit him so i would have better shoot him:D
Yeah your right, but basically he buy this stake, so in our dpos chain he could use his stake to vote and therefore generate this consensus.
In an dpos chain consensus is about buying stake, because the account with the highest stake has the highest influence.
This is something we have to accept and it perhaps is a weak spot, because having the biggest stake doesnt mean you are right.
But in steem consensus having the highest stake means you are right.
And i think he delted the twitter and medium announcements, because he changend his opinion on migrating to the tron blockchain.
The communication of him i read after that was like no we dont would like to tokenswap or bs like this.
hope you understand what i mean, english is not my mother language
regards
That's one way of looking at it. Others see it differently.
I'm not saying I disagree with you - I see what you mean. I also see what others mean. It's a very tough discussion and we might never be able to find out everything that's been going on. We'll have some hard decisions to make nonetheless.
Mine neither, and I appreciate you taking the time to share your views <3