I think one who decided to leave won't do any good in terms of curation and @nextgencrypto probably is a good example of this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I think one who decided to leave won't do any good in terms of curation and @nextgencrypto probably is a good example of this.
You are ignorant and should ideally refrain from insulting one of your largest investors who also happens to be (and always has been) heavily involved in initiatives that support and promote Steem. Unlike you, I happen to be aware of his involvement with both sponsoring the Steemcleaners team and the Curie project (which is specifically curation, since you mentioned it). I don't know what else he might be doing. Your comment is entirely off base and inappropriate.
props for not flagging, although that might be considered slander...
@nextgencrypto is powering down for a long time, I don't see how he is investing in Steem. How come he became our largest investor? I can only see how he is monetizing on our work.
@ned and @dantheman are both powering down. Are they investing in Steam? Have they decided to leave?
I already explained some of the ways he has invested and is investing in Steem. I see him on steemit.chat every single day working with abuse and curation teams that he is both funding and working on directly. The list was not complete. Since you know none of this, you continue to speak out of ignorance, which helps no one, most notably, yourself.
Kindly refrain from inappropriately flagging my comments because they call you out on your ignorance.
I'm not following political debates closely but as far as I remember nextgen decided to leave back in June not agreeing with dev team on curation rewards, so he started powering down a long be before any other whales.
Anyway calling nexgen largest investor shows your ignorance and this is why I flagged your comment.
Please refrain from misquoting me
"one of your largest investors"