Someone else mentioned that it would be cool if when payment is declined it actually burns the rewards. I like that concept, but we don't have it.
Until the average users begins to use flags we will see spam, abuse, and bad actors.
There will always be a few, but part of the problem IMO is everyone wants someone else to do the dirty work of cleaning the site as we go.
I think upvoting myself is a better usage of my voting power than flagging someone.
Well I don't need to vote on your comments then :)
We need to invest in dealing with abuse. This will pay off in the long term. My influence is not great, but I'll keep on doing what I can.
Me too. I agree. I also want to figure out how to reward other end-users who are flagging/cleaning as they go.
I disagree. I think steemit users should focus on saving the newbies instead of tagging possibly the most popular user on steemit and someone who could help make us all richer.
Well, I said unvote me mostly joking! I also specified that giving that same vote to anyone who is actually curating and reading would have the same impact. :)
That can be done at the blockchain level by specifying the @null account as a 100% beneficiary, but there is no UI support for that.