Sort:  

He added the word apology after I added my comment. Nonetheless, he hasn't taken full responsibility.

I'm here fighting for people, for them to be treated as human. What about Ned? Do you agree with Ned who still says that the winners were chosen at random even though the winners were chosen by a conscientious decision made by @andrarchy?

There is still a contradiction between the 2. I'm simply trying to uphold Steemit Inc to their own word. I'm shining the light on their incongruence to help them realize they should act in a congruent way as much as possible.

I think if you dislike the way they "Gave Away" free trips, you should give away some free trips and do it better.

:) I don't want to argue with you, I just have to say this whole post seems unusual.

When you give away free stuff, you get to make up your own rules and change them when it seems like you want to or need to, and it doesn't make anyone else less human. I have no idea what point you are making here or why you are turning this into a big deal.

Trust is an important part of human interactions i.e. business investments. Congruence builds trust while incongruence builds distrust.

@andrarchy took responsibility for the incongruence between what they had first written and what they then decided to do without warning anyone.

Ned hasn't admitted to the incongruence.

Trust is a big deal, it's part of any big deal.

If trust keeps getting broken and no one says anything then trust can't be build or rebuild.

I think it's important to work on trust and for this people need to be held accountable for what they say.

Okay, you are the trust police. Look, I usually like you and agree with you on most topics.

In my opinion you are way out of line here.