I don't think I've ever voted for that guy and I rarely vote for trending posts anyway. They have generally made a good amount and I prefer to reward good posts that are meaning much less. I just don't care about the curation rewards. That's not much compared to what I make from posts and comments. I'm not going to flag the big posts as they may retaliate. He is actively harming the steemit platform and I think the whales who care about it should take action
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, some people are so caught up with Curation rewards, and sure for some people it can be pretty lucrative. But at the end of the day we should be promoting good quality content regardless of the rewards that are coming back to ourselves. That's why I hang out in the Introdcueyourself tag and curate for Curie... I want to reward people who are not getting whale votes already.
Very pleased to hear that.
Despite my very limited time on Steemit I can see there's very deep discord.
If slicing up the rewards pie isn't 'fair' is that due to a developer's 'oversight'? And if so how can it be fixed?
Quality must get its just rewards
Prolific quality even more
Abuse must be designed out of the system otherwise the legitimacy and survival of Steemit is put into question in a crypto world where already the authorities are gearing up to pull the rug out from under it.