I’m in support, although not necessarily as part of the next hardfork. I’m not a hard no on that, but I’m concerned about adding complexity and risk to an already complex and risky hardfork (SMTs).
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I’m in support, although not necessarily as part of the next hardfork. I’m not a hard no on that, but I’m concerned about adding complexity and risk to an already complex and risky hardfork (SMTs).
Sure valid point, however it will just be a parameter change coupled with a cancellation of existing pd's so risk is low. We want to reduce number of HF's to not upset exchanges, imo next HF is still a good time, please vote for this proposal if you are in support.
done
Cool thank u!