I see, ok. I know that the current network is alleged to be only running at a small percentage of capacity, so it may be that the actual limitation for onboarding comes not from hardware, but from resource credits and delegated steem power available for actually creating functional accounts. It would still be good to have some real world data on that though.. Plus what would occur if the faster nodes go down and we have significantly more users on board that we do currently.
The D-App teams need to be confident in advance that their marketing efforts will not result in network problems soon after.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
completely agree. End to End bench marking is an item I was always requesting. There are tools available to benchmark blockchains and its possible to perform the tests. Personally I have been trying to setup a means to effectively test atleast with Tinman but with my office work I have not gone far. But with everyone's support we can do the benchmark with "Caliper". I hope Intel team can support us again once we have the caliper based test suite ready so that a formal bench-marking can be done. :-)