Nice you had some personal interactions, that you report as at least partially satisfying. But that isn't really the way to run a website. Shouldn't have to travel to pay personal ticket to travel to Lisbon 3 weeks after the site issues, to get an explanation from the developers of what is going on. Sound more like a quaint approach from the 1950's; as opposed to anything approaching how a website should communicate with users in 2017.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I understand the concern, but that certainly wasn't the only reason for traveling to Lisbon. :) I would have preferred a different communication approach for sure, but as I tried to outline in my post, they have different objectives and goals and are thinking long term. That may mean at this stage there's a bit of a misalignment between what we all expect as users of the site and what they are able to focus on given their limited time and resources. Hopefully, with things not so much on fire at the moment, we'll start seeing more regular information from them.
Understood. Per my other analogy, they are trying to hit two out of the park home runs with a single at bat. They are swinging for the fences.
Small chance of success when you bet everything on such a high risk approach.
If it works out, STEEM will end up challenging BTC and ETH for top coin status. Very low chances of that.
But it is the vision they are aiming for. Not absolutely impossible. Just very unlikely.
So anyone that has money in STEEM that they think of as an investment, needs to consider the nature of that investment and consider how probable the strategic success could be that STEEM team is aiming for.
If they are successful, $1 coin could grow to $7K. Just like BTC.