In these 104 weeks a lot of things may change. I can only speak for my self. I took advantage of the higher prices a few months back and traded steem after a two week power down. As a result I doubled my Steem holdings and powered up.
I couldn’t afford to invest further more at that point so having an opportunity to do so just to bring more steem in wouldn’t have happened if there was the limitation you mention.
Does that mean I don’t care? Or that I ain’t dedicated to the direction of the platform?
Now I know, not everyone thinks the way I do but a two year limitation doesn’t really make Steemit an attractive destination for investors.
Just my thoughts...
It was 104 weeks when I first invested.
Knowing short term thinking couldn't tank the price; that my co-investors were planning 2 years ahead; that was a big selling point.
This seems like a good idea to keep a platform afloat in the early stages but more and more of a crutch as it evolves.