how this would improve steem
As is, the decision-making process seems top-heavy. Many noteworthy proposals are being made for improving the Steemit platform in order to ultimately grow STEEM; but seemingly those making the proposals aren’t really being heard.
worth electing another board of users to be decision makers
I think the fewer ‘boards’ we have, the fewer conflicts. Perhaps, you could share why you deem a need for ‘electing’ another board.
Again, as is, without it being mandatory, too few Steemians are participating in the witness-selection process, by personal choice, or proxy. So, the thought of another ‘election’ makes me dizzy, lol, and smh simultaneously. I think it becomes a case of KIS…
Peace.
understood. interesting point! iam intersted to see this dicussion develop going forwards
✌!