@globocop, there might be a Steemit killer > https://steemit.com/steemit/@blockrush/is-wildspark-the-steemit-killer-blockrush
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
@globocop, there might be a Steemit killer > https://steemit.com/steemit/@blockrush/is-wildspark-the-steemit-killer-blockrush
Interesting. But a Steemit Killer?
A different concept all together. With view of investment, advertising, reward distribution and content creation.
Instead of laboring every point, as some have been addressed in the original post, this comment is addressing content.
The principle of link sharing. Does Wild Park see itself as an aggregator or existing content on different platforms rather than a original content creator?
Is it not likely that this concept will attract all those people who are merely copy/pasting other people's content to make a quick buck?
Content Content Content
Steemit's emphasis is on original content creation in any genre imaginable.
Wild Park, with its link affiliation, invites to share Other People's content, rather than creating original work. How does this par with copyright laws?
I don't see Wild Park as a competitor but as a complimentary external platform. Why not promote one's own content elsewhere?
One last thought. I am reluctant to use or promote main stream platforms such as FB, YT, Twitter etc. These giants monopolies has become politicised beyond value-add.
ch @globocop
i still see people getting rewarded on steemit for posting copyrighted material without any permission of copyrightholders , so not really any differences with wildspark on copyrights.
Yes, however, @cheetah and the tireless people at @steemcleaners are trying to educate the users, as many of the quality providers here are.
ch @globocop
i know but that still ain't bulletproof i report + / - 10 people a day @steemcleaners and only people that claim they make it are being punished.
people who link back without legal permission of the artist still get paid and not punished as should.