I don't think he meant having a logo but dedicating time and resources to a new logo when the site itself isn't functioning properly with the logo it currently has. I am sure you knew what he meant you just needed the glory of replying to @berniesanders in defense of @ned does it feel nice to sound like a schmuck. One that doesn't understand that a new logo bringing more people to a broken site will lose us more new members than the current logo on a working site would retain? What's so hard to grasp there?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Guess I am just a more tolerant schmuck that thinks we can have fun while waiting for things to be fixed. Or, what you said might also be true - my English is too bad to really comprehend this. Replying to bernie is a glory? that is also a news to me, or, again, my English might be too bad to misunderstand you again. I don't see anything improper in defending a site that I care, not the person. A further conversation will only be warranted if you say it nicely.
No, your English is just fine. Just found it odd the same comment was made by Bernie after I said it and the replies and votes flew to Bernie. I figured you were just a proper puppet. My bad, carry on.