You clearly chose a side by investigating anyone close to us at all and not investigating them at all. You're sherlockholmes, you figure out why this is fucked up. Hint: look at the left side qualifications and how the right side doesn't comply. If you're really interested this is the database entry where transisto denied knowing newsflash that magically disappeared. But I'm sure you already knew that. You've already exposed your "side" and it's clearly not the truth.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Your screenshot shows an SQL DB, so I still do not know what you are looking at there, it certainly isn't real blockchain data.
If you are implying that someone deleted something from some database, you should be more specific.
Deleting evidence on the blockchain should by no means be possible!
Also, that "owner" thing you are highlighting contains child elements, you are highlighting the parent level and it's properties, not the content. Even if someone deleted the contents here, the owner signature of the account would be gone, making the account invalid. so yeah?!? What is this even supposed to be about?
What "side" is that you put me on?!