Thanks for the reply.
IMHO that's just how capital/market works. Everyone give out their opinions, of course different people will have different opinions, at the end, the ones get positive feedback from all voters get the most rewards, the ones got less positive feedback get less rewards. If I understood correctly, your approach is more like communism, only reward the ones that you all agreed to reward, as someone pointed out, it's less likely to scale well.
By the way, when I used the word "leading", I meant that one member vote with a whale's account, but not necessarily mean front running, from an author's point of view it's no difference.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: