I think it may be further diluted. Really the best way to get exposure is to get followers, and that takes time.
Thinking about it, with the more users there are the more chances to gain followers there will be.
I don't think I quite understand the voting curve change other than it's "going to be good" lol I know very little about coding.
Plus if they get the communities eventually developed that will change things a lot so that we are not all looking at the same bucket with ever post in it.
Communities will definitely help to highlight material better than we're seeing it as of current. I look forward to that development.
True but it also doesn't make it nefarious.
I wasn't necessarily stating that there were nefarious motivations behind the way things may be, but just that when something is brought to attention that more than brushing it off as happenstance may be in order.
Yet often it is just trying to deal with how to get good content to people when GOOD content is a very subjective thing. If it was programmatically easy to detect the GOOD content from the bad content then there wouldn't be much need of us.
This is sort of what I was asking with the first question of whether it is possible to objectify value on the blockchain. I think there could be a way to detect it but then have us being the filters. I do not know how that would happen though.