I feel the same way as you so about this, just keep in mind that there has been a surge in new users recently, many of whom are still learning the unwritten and unspoken guidelines this community follows. This requires a delicate touch to deal with properly, because outright telling people they're doing something wrong when they're still learning will make you appear elitist. A lot of people are probably coming from reddit, which is similar to Steemit at first glance, but very different after a closer look. We need to educate people and help them grow, if we're not careful we'll only succeed in driving them away.
Alright, well said, only someone does what they should do to help beginners.
Much big voices vote for their clan and they are on their clan.
Class divorce should be on a lame threshold here at steemit.
For those who invested 1 year ago we should use power on the small fish in the balls.
Everyone can not write great top articles, but everyone deserves a vote on the comments. Vote for both. They are future bloggers, many of them want Steemit to move forward. I help them and additionally re-steem are the better posts and work.
Many would give up here when they just disappeared in the mega and got a voice once.
NOW they are time and printer gets a little pay.
Divide your voice into the middle portions and share the readers.
Then we help more to be self-employed and they will then help new ones
meep
Well said. And this is not just a "good post" comment or "good answer" but it really is good advice, so I had to say something.
Thank you. I work to ensure continued growth in the value of my shares, as any responsible shareholder should.
I think you would be shocked if I showed you the data I am analysing.
Many - not all - newbies have their mantra prepared: post-junk self-upvote-junk spam-comments self-upvote-spam-comments repeat! Every cent reinvested in SP and this is the future.
Why is self-upvoting even allowed, and more importantly, why does it result in a payout?