Didn't we had this conversation back in Curie when you realized I never took a single dime and you backed off?
We have never had a discussion in Curie. And I never had a reason to "back off" because I have never attempted to "attack" anybody. I have been respectful, including in my conversations with @donkeypong, @hanshotfirst, and @ned.
Now, if you feel the need to continue trolling, I would suggest that you reconsider. You're not exactly making yourself look good here. If you would rather prefer to have an honest and respectful discussion, I would appreciate that.
And you voted the Wingz comment with your trail instead of this rather less flattering part of the tree. So it looks like that one has 65 votes. Steem Guild members have NEVER been that sleazy. You are the one who owes this community some transparency and accountability. Well played, David, sir.
I am respectfully asking valid questions. Trolling is something else.
Trolling is when you use people's vote trains to vote on toxic comments, that is trolling ;)
I'm all for honesty. Since we are on honesty.
Do you abuse people's vote trains AGAINST their consent to vote on toxic comments?
You see that is not very honest, now is it?
Is @steemship correct with the massive hypocrisy question or is he wrong? Do you vote ALL your posts while pointing the fingers?
I rest my case.
@ats-david I love that you wrote this, and it brought back many conversations we had when users, including myself were questioning steemvoter and ozcharts.. It is the same conversation. Bots voting up the same users every day, sometimes multiple times a day.
The end result is SteemIt isn't lotteryish at all. We can all guess who will trend tomorrow. The community grows weary, and we rinse and repeat. I guess it doesn't matter what "side or group" you are in. It just feels scamy.
lol i think hes confusing you with me. Back when curie first started up, i commented on a post that i was skeptical about the effectiveness of the model because the way it funded itself (curie posts and curie founders getting thousands in rewards for statistics and self congratulation) worked at cross-purposes to its stated intent (getting more money to those producing quality content).
The response was a slew of profanity, threats and assorted nonsense in both chat and the thread. Including threats of a blacklist (which were later deleted and revised. Apparently in whatever language they speak on the alien's home planet the word "blacklist" means "mute-button". Who knew.)
When another user (who quit soon after) saw the absurd rant in chat, he posted about it, but was pressured by curie to remove the post.