-nesting limit-
Blatant lies and being involved in issues is non-essential?
Which means I wouldn't mind if a witness had a position on it or not.
What does that mean exactly? How is it a position? Is it not a statement of fact.
He lied, supports blackmail/extortion directly and has used his voting power in disingenuous ways. Is that a position? Or you are arguing that if someone adopts such a position it's a non-essential? Is the witness not supposed to have integrity? Is not essential therefore to be credible, by your standard, to be a witness?
adjective: disingenuous
not candid or sincere, typically by pretending that one knows less about something than one really does.
His little experiment, as I believe he was trying something and then reverted to his old way, is there on the blockchain to draw your own conclusions from, but as I see it by the content that he voted, is that he voted for two different and strongly opposing views and gave neither as much as a cent, which is antagonistic:
adjective: antagonistic
showing or feeling active opposition or hostility toward someone or something.
while he later boasted how much 1% from him means and having voted over 2k times not dropping below 80% voting power left in 24 hours while comparatively during that time of disingenuous 0.03% votes and odd 1.33% votes he hardly voted, and it's daring to argue it was automated as one can see the change in the voting percent, from .04% to .1% to .03% in between the regular 1.33%.