It seems that 6.6% of rewards go to commenters and 70.7% go to the authors, curation is more profitable then commenting it seems, 14.2%. A theoretical split would be better at 10-90, these numbers are kinda sad from the point of engagement.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah I am hoping engagement shifts... So based upon today's models that could work. We could also go closer to my 20% / 80% that I made up out of the air and effectively be doubling the ceiling for comment engagement.
Yeah I always thought we were going to an N curve but it sounds like we went to 4N for some obscure reason.
Note I really don't want a ceiling. I do think having a firewall to protect different types of activities from each other might be worth doing though.
I personally believe curating pays too much. Yet it is that payout that continues to inspire the truly powerful to keep spreading the wealth. Hopefully not just to themselves.
The guy at the bottom of that list was the person I interacted with that I watched obsessively up voting his own comments. I just looked at his account and the top one on the list. They may have stopped... Though they guy I dealt with only has two comments so far of his within the past 4 hours or so that he didn't up vote. So we shall see.
Yeah I do think there are only a few offenders at the moment.
You probably get a kick out of knowing that too as I know you've had some run ins with that person.
Not so much an operation... other than victim of a mind plague that like a zombie seeks to spread it. :) Doesn't want to hear anything new, just wants to eat brains.