And what do you base your insipid opinions on? Did you not bring up the suggestion of no flags? What I pointed out in such a scenario is entirely pertinent to your suggestion, and there's absolutely nothing to debate about that not being pertinent. You can make up as many excuses as you wish to avoid that conversation and then try to claim that it's about me when it has absolutely nothing to do with me and my qualities, it is all about what would happen where there no flags, but thanks for demonstrating yet again your petulant insistence on strawmen and ad hominems alike, don't forget to yet again show that disagreeing with my remark regarding the inevitable consequences of no flagging without being able to formulate anything of substance or at least thoughtful (argument from silence, first claiming that you'll quit the conversation because I'm not respectful, which is a blatant lie, and then another argument from silence justifying it by claims that I'm not reasonable or open minded) was not enough, you needed to try and censor me, something that you claim to be entirely against, or as you call it, "free speech absolutist", and then continue to do so, hypocrisy at it's best. Let me guess, you think that it's censorship sometimes, but not all the time to flag, right, or you don't even bother to try and justify it, right?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Well, of all the requirements I have for a worthy individual to debate with online I would have to say the ability to competently utilize the space bar on the keyboard is of the utmost importance.
I did not lie, you are slandering me. Images are removed from visibility due to low rating, unless the site changed that. What you are claiming is that the blockchain data remains there. Yeah, maybe, but who is going to see it? Who is realistically going to spin up a condensor site just so that they can see their own content, which was made not visible for the rest of the community? Nobody.