The point is that you're not entitled to people NOT flagging you. Your proposal of removing the flag has been debated 2 years ago. War doesn't cause a platform to lose value, that's only your opinion. You don't want to hear that people FLAGGING you are not terrorizing you, but then you'd have to grow some thick skin and not have to REDESIGN the entire platform because you got flagged. Flagging is only an expression of opinion, and if you belive yourself entitled to the rewards that are still being voted on you disregard the opinion of those that validly can vote how they want, including redistributing rewards from your post to others. On the other hand, you can very well dismiss me as unreasonable, but unreasonable is pleading with a need to redesign the platform because you got hurt feelings over people on the internet voting on your content and when confrunted that the people you ought to dialogue about this with aren't interested in dialogue you think you can somehow avoid that inconvenient fact and proceed to tell me how you dismiss those interested in understanding your plight as "you did not understand anything" and "im not accusing anyone, but i did tell you that I give you the last answer because you understand, you don't accuse that I cannot be reasoned with." What a joke, if you think I am aggressive you probably need to reconsider being on the internet, because the internet will not stand up for your cries, like you have noticed, and they don't want to hear it to begin with since most have actually thoroughly considered alternatives and didn't simply cry about it while hardly considering what they propose and the implications thereof. Instead of focusing on my tone, which is a fallacy of TONE POLICING, you ought to be specific as to exactly what I didn't understand if you indeed are for dialogue and aren't making a mockery of it, and instead of accusing me of being aggressive, which is only your opinion that you cared not to explain or clarify in the least, you actually explain what was aggressive and why, so at least you have the appearance of reasonable.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You are completely out of the way... Luckily there are few who think like you, otherwise Steemit would have already disappeared. Leave it alone, you can not understand.
What dialogue do you want? You only accused me and criticized in your every comment, this is not dialogue!!! If you look at whatsup he has expressed his opinion, contrary to mine, but he used the right way and I respect him. I do not like your aggressive way and I do not want to talk with these tones. I wish you good continuation, goodbye.
I did not joke you and I did not say that you do not understand anything. Your opinions may be valid, but not when you do not understand my message. I will be naive or too optimistic, you can see it as you want, but I aim for a constructive dialogue, this has made sure that those who had flagged me, now have supported this post.
I repeat, you can believe that I am naive, I do not care, I'm spending too much time on your comments, there are many good users who need my help, I prefer to spend my time on them. But I'm on Steemit before you, I know this is not the first or the last post on this topic. But I try to send a constructive message. You want to understand it, well, you want to continue to create controversy, do it alone. That's all.
Ok, but if everyone thinks so then it is sure that nothing changes. I know that my single post is useless, but if everyone continues to insist on the question, maybe something will change, do not you think?