Eh, give the guy a break. It's clear what he meant. He has refrained from commenting, due to the upcoming changes he mentioned. After voting power can be delegated on the blockchain level, this will be a moot point.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
once the abuse is institutionalized, it won't be abuse anymore? BEcause we can only assume that the same practices everyone is concerned about now (SG upvoting their own shitposts as payment for reading steemit) will continue.
Although I understand his point and yours, I disagree it isn't an issue right now. As, it is a creditability issue for SteemIt, and he is a Founder.
I would say it "appears" it is not a hands-off approach. Appearances matter.
I didn't burn him at the stake. ;)