That assumes a few things:
a) bots programmed in any language won't be able to interact with the blockchain anymore (this is less 'free', not more since people create these bots),
b) how do we 'ban' accounts?
c) should we have the power to ban accounts?
d) the community is willing to give up their power to moderate things themselves and put it in the hands of a chosen few.
These aren't solutions you offer. Only a return to the same systems most of us are trying to escape from.
I never said "bots programmed in any language won't be able to interact with the blockchain anymore"... I said that the bots that are useful shouldn't have social interactions on the site. Why can't they can do this type of work without spamming the website? I know the answer already... $$
Instead of short term gain, we should look at the long game.
Since I won't get anywhere with you on points b, c, and d, which are all the same, I won't bother to address it. So fine, no moderators. I still think bots shouldn't post, or upvote, or flag.
Go ahead, just automate everything and take humans out of the equation. I'm sure these big corporations will want to jump on board to advertise to a userbase that is full of automated bots, that's when the value of Steem will surely skyrocket, a bot based community that does all the work! It's genius!