Very interesting. I see the opposite. Subscriber seems cold. Follower seems warm, more personable. Following is built into the family psyche. One follows in the footsteps of our fathers for example. We followed Martin Luther King. We followed Christ. I think it has a deeper connotation. I think subscriber has evolved into answer to the onslaught of the machine. For what it's worth!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Ok yeah I can see that. Thats a very interesting point and I really like that. What if I were to propose, though, the idea that following your own path rather than your father's or being the Martin Luther King Jr instead of just being behind one is better? Just wondering what you would think there. I hope this makes sense.
You are quite the conversationalist young man. However, if you follow a path of your own making from your beliefs you are still following your patg but maybe subscribing to your beliefs!
Okay fair enough. That makes sense. Thanks for the coversation and the complement!