I am usually creating one post per day, and I don't have problem with upvoting it. I never upvote my comments, I tread it as abuse of system. The same like creating 10 post per day and upvoting them by own with 100% of your SP, this is abuse of system, last time I had seen a lot of account who do that i.e "photo from morning coffee" why not plus 100% VP which means 4+USD, "photo from afternoon coffee" whny not and the same - 100 VP etc. Of course it fully legal, but steemit had been created to award good quality posts of others. If I see that somebody put more than usuall to creat the post, and this post is good quality I had no doubt that it deserve for my 100% VP, which is just 0,01 USD, but it is my contribution to the system.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thank you very much for your reply.
I understand your point as investor, you invest some money and want take profit of it. If you consider SteemPower as investment that your right, but if everybody would think in that way you should not require that somebody else would vote on your 10 daily posts.
If everybody would think selfish like you, so nobody will vote on nobody except own content, so do you think that was idea of @ned to create platform for selfish people.
What you mean "is fair start point for good curations"? If you give yourself 10 full votes per day, what you can offer for curation, some votes for 1%, I know that it is more than most people have with their 100%.
I see on profile that there are some people who thinks like me.
Do you think that @changyoon would flag your post if you start write good quality articles, even 2-3 per day and used full SP to upvote them? I don't think so.
I know that I will not convince you to change your behaviour, but who knows, maybe you think it.