I don't think more "good post!" spam comments is what we need.
Comments rewards are already pretty good, the incentive is already there. It also doesn't help with the SP valuation problem.
I don't think more "good post!" spam comments is what we need.
Comments rewards are already pretty good, the incentive is already there. It also doesn't help with the SP valuation problem.
It wouldn't be the comments themselves that get the reward, but the upvoted comments. Why I had specified the "what can humans do easily that bots cannot" line.
good post..... would go just as unnoticed as it does today. However a well thought out counter-argument to points in the post, that has the support of votes, and maybe the authors counter post to that.... it removes the bots from the equation a bit more and still allows the author to compete for more than the 25% they get by default.